Skip to Content
Call Today for a Consultation 205-335-2640

Appeal: Timeliness


The trial court entered a divorce judgment on November 7, 2013. The mother filed a post-judgment motion on November 18, 2013. The motion was due to be denied by operation of law on February 18, 2014. On February 7, 2014, the parties filed a joint motion seeking to extend the time in which the mother’s post-judgment motion could remain pending. On that same date, the court entered an order extending the time by an additional 30 days. The trial court purported to rule on the post-judgment motion on June 18, 2014. In so doing, the court changed its original ruling and awarded custody of the parties’ child to the mother instead of the father. The father appealed. Appeal dismissed. Slaton v. Slaton


Contact Ingram Law Today

Request a Consultation by Filling Out This Form
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy