Skip to Content
Call Today for a Consultation 205-335-2640

Criminal Jury Selection


Wheat owned a convenience store in Wagarville. On the morning of December 19, 2008, two women saw Defendant run out of the store and get into an automobile driven by Juan Crayton. A short time later, a customer walked into the store and found Wheat dead on the floor.

Crayton drove to the home of Earnest Barnes in Mobile. Barnes took Defendant to the bus station where he bought a ticket to Tampa, Florida. Barnes received a call from his cousin who told him that Defendant and Crayton had killed someone. Barnes contacted law enforcement and reported his contact with the two men. Defendant was arrested at the bus station. Barnes gave police permission to search his property. In the backyard, they found Wheat’s driver’s license and bank cards. After Defendant was arrested, he invoked his right to counsel.
The Defendant asked to speak to police investigators. Deputy Ferrell Grimes went to the jail where he reviewed a Miranda form with Wimbley. Defendant signed it. Defendant told Deputy Grimes that he had shot Wheat and stolen cash. He then spread gasoline in the store and on Wheat and tried to set it on fire. Defendant was found guilty of one count of capital murder for killing Wheat during the course of a robbery and one count of capital murder for killing Wheat during the course of an arson.

He was sentenced to death on both counts. He appealed. Affirmed. In this case, “Defendant sought to speak with officers investigating his crime, not merely his jailers. When he met with the officers investigating his crime, he stated that he had asked to speak with them to tell them everything he knew’.” This issue does not afford Defendant any relief.
“A confession is not rendered involuntary if it was made in response to a promise of benefit that was solicited by the accused.” Ex parte Siebert, 555 So.2d 780, 782 (Ala.1989). Based on the record and the plain-error rule, the Court rejected these arguments as well as others submitted by Wimbley. The judgment of the trial court is due to be affirmed. Wimbley v. State of Alabama


Contact Ingram Law Today

Request a Consultation by Filling Out This Form
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy