Skip to Content
Call Today for a Consultation 205-335-2640

Process of Service in Alabama


In Voltz v. Dyess, the Supreme Court ruled according to Ala. R. Civ. P. 4 and held that an action may not be dismissed for failure to effect service unless a plaintiff is given a 14-day notice. The Court noted that, standing alone, the plaintiff ’s lengthy delay might warrant dismissal for lack of service pursuant to Rule 41(b), Ala. R. Civ. P., permitting dismissal for failure to prosecute, but that the court did not dismiss the action pursuant to that rule. Under Rule 4(b), a failure to effect service within 120 days does not, alone, warrant summary dismissal absent at least 14 days’ notice.


Contact Ingram Law Today

Request a Consultation by Filling Out This Form
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy